Tanya's attitude towards God is the same as her attitude towards the New Empire. She acknowledges the existence of both, but from the bottom of her heart she does not want to admit their rationality.
He strongly denied God and absolutely refused to accept the new empire.
Are personal likes and dislikes determined by reason?
It can also be said that the denial of God is a different definition of divinity, so different ways do not conflict with each other. So how are the likes and dislikes of society and the country determined? It is definitely not reason.
Tanya is in prison and is still defending the old empire and attacking the new empire to express her dissatisfaction. This is obviously not the result of reason. It is the deep fear of the Red Empire in her heart, whether before or after time travel.
Have the same fear.
Tanya noticed that Dulan was looking at her with a smile, and her mood was complicated. She still didn't understand what Dulan wanted her to do? Did Duran want to force herself to change just like God?
It's almost the same. Both Dulan and God want to transform Tanya, but Duran hopes that Tanya can realize the equality of everyone, while God needs Tanya's faith.
Poor Tanya became the tool of God and Duran.
"You think the old aristocracy has many benefits, but don't you see that the empire has been forced to take the wrong path of military expansion because of the old rules? If the empire does not change, then only destruction awaits them. The worst outcome is
It means that it will be divided by neighboring countries from now on and exist in name only. A better ending would be to lose the war and become an eternal sinner. Can't you see it?"
Tanya thought that there was another possibility, which was victory: "The empire's military and industrial capabilities are not weak, so it is possible to win."
"Haha, why should we win? Do we put the hope of victory in international non-interference? Why do you think that other countries will let the empire expand without taking action to stop it? Your thinking is too simple. As long as other countries intervene, it will
The empire's reserve supplies are simply not enough to fight. You magisters really only need to eat some bread to fight, but aircraft and tanks need fuel. The consumption of these mechanized troops is not something the empire can support." Duran said: "
Besides, even if the war is really won, can the situation of the empire really get better? Even if we win, the problems of the empire will not be solved, it will just be transferred to other countries and other lands. Do you know why?"
Tanya was silent, she didn't know and had never learned.
"That's because there are inherent contradictions in capital. Originally, money was just an exchange intermediary. However, in the era of capital, money has become more substitute than commodity, and capitalists are all pursuing the accumulation and increase of money. Then I have to ask you.
, Can the currency be eaten or worn? How long can the currency be kept warm after it is burned?"
Tanya remained silent.
"In this era, there are indeed no shackles and whips. They will not force you to work in the fields like a slave society. Instead, they will use currency as a bargaining chip to continuously absorb countless laborers to work voluntarily and extract their surplus labor. It seems that everything is voluntary and equal.
But in fact, the value represented by money is constantly shrinking. On the one hand, capital hopes that the labor force will have strong consumption power, and on the other hand, it constantly limits wage growth, limits labor costs, and disrupts market prices. This leads to endogenous changes in capital.
The basic contradiction is the contradiction between supply and demand." "On the one hand, we continue to produce excess industrial goods, and on the other hand, we continue to suppress the value of labor, leading to a downturn in the demand market. This contradiction will not disappear. Capital continues to obtain currency, which ultimately leads to continuous manufacturing.
poor."
Tanya knew that this was capital theory, and she understood it. But she was about to refute Duran: "But don't forget that technology has been developed in this process. Without this process of chasing money, there wouldn't be so many
Technology will not improve everyone's quality of life. Although capital creates a variety of new demands in order to sell goods, new technologies do improve the quality of life of all mankind. This is the driving force for the progress of human civilization. Even if the contradiction between supply and demand will not be
Solve it, even if the conflict is just a transfer, every transfer can benefit some people. Isn't that enough?" As a social animal, Tanya is very capable, and she has read many books.
Capital does have contradictions that are absolutely impossible to solve, but as long as there are areas in the world that are not covered by industry, the operation of capital will always be effective, and you will always be able to make money through scissors. Moreover, technology is constantly improving, which means that human needs are being eliminated.
Satisfaction: "What you call creating poverty is also poverty without worrying about food and drink. It is poverty that is guaranteed."
Dulan couldn't help but shake his head. Is he really not worried about food and drink? Has Tanya forgotten that she almost couldn't eat in the orphanage two years ago, and why the empire embarked on the path of military expansion.
"In a country that pursues the goal of currency growth, who will spend money to store agricultural products, and who will spend money to transport agricultural products to the people who need them? There is another important thing, that is, the real need for food
The poor actually have no monetary value. Will capital subsidize the costs of warehousing, transportation, distribution, etc. for a person who has no monetary value?" Duran asked.
"Of course the Empire will do it." Tanya said.
"Then where does the empire's money come from?"
"You can lend money, you can print money." Tanya said, in fact, this is what the empire is doing now. Therefore, the old empire has long been kidnapped by capital, and it must go to war, otherwise it will explode internally.
"Treating the poor means there is no income at all. If the empire keeps doing this, it will be unable to make ends meet, so what?"
Tanya said: "If it doesn't work, you can still issue national bonds and pool the people's savings. As long as you have money, you can produce, and you can even launch wars and divert conflicts." If you pool all the people's savings, Tanya said
Not realizing that she created more poverty.
"Excellent, you are really suitable for this prison. You and the nobles have the same idea." "Wage war to expand the territory, go out to rob, and finally divide the people's money into 30-70 accounts, and return the original money of the gentry. Complete
A national crime." Duran couldn't help but applaud Tanya. She is indeed a bourgeois warrior who grew up under the sun. Her thinking logic is exactly the same as that of the imperial nobles. It's no wonder that she can integrate into the old rules without any pressure.
Tanya found that her logic of thinking was being implemented by the empire, and she originally thought that after the transfer of capital contradictions, the poor could have enough food and clothing, but obviously the contradictions would eventually evolve into war, so why should the people be afraid of death if they are not afraid of death?
situation.
Therefore, if conflicts do not disappear, they will only snowball and get bigger and bigger. Even if people in developed countries are not short of food and drink for the time being, how can there be eggs after the nest is overturned? When capital conflicts break out, countries and countries will become robbers.
, when the time comes, the people of any country will not have a good end.
Therefore, the contradiction must be resolved, rather than just shifting the contradiction. This contradiction is endogenous to capital, and to resolve the contradiction, capital must be resolved.
Tanya naturally discovered the problem, but she knew that there was still room for the transfer of conflicts in this different world, and the empire might have been successful in transferring conflicts. However, because of the emergence of Dulan and others, the empire had changed from a country that took the initiative to transfer conflicts to a country that was being forced to transfer conflicts.
Countries that transfer conflicts.
"I don't believe you can resolve conflicts. Your actions only make the empire a country that passively accepts the transfer of conflicts in other countries. Originally, the empire was a robber with a sharp knife, but now it will become the victim of several other robbers." Tanya
Said, the result of rational analysis is that all countries in this world are bandits, and the empire was originally one of them, but now it will become a victim.