Conan thought that this was wrong. Their detectives could only solve the case after it happened. If the case didn't happen, even if he had the idea of killing, he couldn't kill him. Instead, he should use other methods to dissuade him. If he really wanted to kill,
We can only catch him while he is doing it and then prosecute him for attempted murder.
It's not okay to kill someone without hearing anything about the murder before it even happened.
"Minority Report" and "Psychometer" said that they predict the criminal before the crime occurs and shoot him directly. Justice will never be late again, or even earlier.
Delayed justice is no longer justice. Now justice is advanced. Unfortunately, everyone is not satisfied with it. They think it is okay to kill someone in your heart, as long as you don't implement it.
After all, the deeds do not matter the heart, and there is no perfect person in the world. Who doesn’t have some bad thoughts in his heart? You can’t just shoot someone because of bad thoughts? As long as you don’t implement them, it’s not a crime to think about it.
This old woman was worried that justice would be late, so she planned to kill her companions in advance, which was really not a good idea.
This is a treasure hunting plan planned by the two of them, but the old woman and her companion have differences. The old woman just wants to find the treasure and fulfill her father's last wish. But the companion feels that he should use this opportunity to kill several detectives. Although he is also a detective himself
, but he could no longer restrain his inner desire to commit crimes.
When I keep solving crimes, sometimes I wonder if I can also commit crimes and challenge the law? As a detective who is familiar with the process of committing various crimes, can he become an excellent criminal? Many detectives sometimes think this way.
"When you solve too many cases, you will indeed have the urge to commit crimes. I can understand it." But it was the fat detective Polo who said what was in his heart: "I used to think that if I could solve a case, I would definitely commit one. Until I and the gangster
Stings once sneaked into a suspect's house to steal evidence, only to realize that being able to solve a case may not necessarily lead to committing a crime." That time, he and Hastings, as thieves, pretended to be lock repairers during the day and successfully left a mark on the window.
They set off the trap and sneaked in smoothly at night. But things went wrong next. Although they found clues, they were also discovered by their master. Hastings sneaked away unfaithfully, and Polo was sent away because he was not good at running.
Entered the police station.
If he hadn't been good friends with the police chief, Polo would have stayed in the police station for a few days.
"There will be various uncontrollable factors when committing a crime, and solving a crime is just looking back at the process of committing a crime. All uncontrollable factors have turned into clues." "So, committing a crime and solving a crime are completely different things. The same uncontrollable factors,
When committing a crime, it is an obstacle, but when it is solved, it is a clue. Committing a crime and solving a crime are completely opposite, so I advise detectives not to think that just because they can solve a crime, they will definitely be able to commit the crime. Even detectives cannot control the process of committing a crime." Polo understood deeply.
My experience is that situations often occur when committing crimes.
Even if a detective can come up with the perfect crime modus operandi, there will still be uncontrollable factors when it comes to actual practice.
"I didn't commit a crime. I just wanted to use this opportunity to commit a crime, but I didn't commit it at all. I am innocent." The accomplice said that he would not take the blame: "On the contrary, this old woman attempted murder. She had already poisoned her, but
I was lucky and everything was fine."
"I just want to prevent you from committing a crime, but I don't want justice to be delayed." The old woman also spoke plausibly.
Neither of them thought they were wrong.
Conan was also helpless. If he knew someone was going to kill someone, he would definitely stop it, but it is impossible to kill someone to stop someone from killing someone.
"I think this old woman is right. Anyone who has the idea of killing innocent people should be eliminated." Dulan suddenly appeared and said.
"Uncle Du, why are you here?" Xiaolan was surprised.
"Because the car rented by Mr. Maoli sounded an alarm, I came immediately to provide support." Dulan said: "This is after-sales service. In fact, I stood at the door for a while and heard your discussion. I think we should advance
To prevent crime.”
"This is impossible." "How is it possible to know the crime in advance?" Kaito Kidd borrowed the identity of Kogoro Mori to ask the question. If he could know the crime in advance, then he, the Phantom Thief, could retire.
"It can be done. There is a 'psychological measurement' technology that can measure each person's crime value. Once the crime value rises, he can be killed directly." "The principle of this technology is also very simple. It is to collect a thousand top-level people.
The brains of criminals are connected to form a 'crime value measurement system'. Through the thoughts of a thousand criminals, the criminal psychology index of the entire society can be monitored in real time. As long as there is a fluctuation, they will be killed directly, so that there will be no crime.
Now." Duran said that this was a technique from "The Psychometrician".
Use the brains of a thousand criminals to stop more criminals. Of course, in the series, the protagonist is very contradictory. After all, isn't it ironic to let the brains of criminals have such great power and control the entire society?
In fact, thieves also have their ways, and the abilities of top criminals are not bad.
Of course, it is the brains of criminals after all, and it will always feel weird to let criminals monitor the operation of society. The protagonist in the original work feels this way, but as an insider, she did not oppose these criminal brains in the end, but became a member of the system.
Supporter, because she knows that this society needs a 'measurement system', which has indeed reduced crime. Although this system is maintained by criminals, there is no better alternative. So even if she cannot accept it, she can only work hard
maintain.
The plot of "The Psychometrician" discusses a phenomenon: those who steal hooks will be punished, and those who steal the country will be punished by princes; killing one person is considered a crime, and massacring ten thousand people is considered a hero.
It is also a crime. In the measurement system, ordinary criminals will be killed directly as long as their crime value exceeds the dangerous value. However, the brains of a thousand top criminals are so high that they have become the cornerstone of the country's stability.
We are all criminals, why should we treat them differently? Why should those who steal the hook be punished, and those who steal the country should be punished by the princes?
The difference between top criminals and ordinary criminals is that top criminals hurt more people, are more cold-blooded, and are more ruthless.
But in fact, as a decision-maker, you have to be cold-blooded and ruthless. As long as you don't favor one and treat others equally, then you are a good decision-maker.
Benevolence, justice, propriety, wisdom and trust, as long as you master these, you can become a top criminal, and of course, you can also become a qualified decision-maker.
Ordinary criminals obviously cannot meet the requirements of benevolence, justice, propriety, wisdom and trust.
So why are those who steal the hook punished and those who steal the country and the princes? It is because those who steal the hook cannot meet the requirements of thieves and cannot attract more people into their distribution relationship.
The thieves have already won over many people and tied them to their own interests. We must know that the common benefit of the world is for the sake of great harmony. If everyone in the world becomes a community of interests, then it will be a great harmony society.
This is not easy. Benevolence, justice, propriety, wisdom and trust are all indispensable. Without these abilities, even if the country is stolen, it will be overthrown very quickly.
Just look at the thieves of the country in the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, and you will know that to steal the country, you have to win people's hearts, you have to have a clever name, and you have to have excellent strength, otherwise you will not be able to steal the country.
The three families of Jin State were divided into Jin, and the Tian family of Qi State replaced Jiang. They are all famous cases of stealing the country. In Jin State, the royal family weakened itself and allowed the six ministers to come to power. In Qi State, Tian family controlled the economic lifeline, and finally the economy surpassed the royal family.
, and bought people's hearts through big buckets of lending and small buckets of collecting money.
One hundred yuan was lent and only ninety-nine yuan was charged. How could everyone not support the Tian family?
Please remember the first domain name of this book:. Mobile version reading URL: