Does this mean that our education system is not as good as the American education system? Does this mean that our education system only trains students with high scores and low abilities?
Obviously, our education system is a very successful education system and a very excellent education system. It has imported a large number of high-quality and high-level academic talents for our country's economic construction. It has made great contributions to our country's scientific and technological development.
contribution.
Those who still say that our education system is not very good and not as good as the American education system. If they still think that American education is quality education and Chinese education is only exam-oriented education, then they don’t know how to pretend to understand. China has made great achievements in the past thirty years.
Those who still think that the moon in foreign countries is rounder than the moon in China should be severely slapped in the face.
It took China thirty years to complete the road that the United States took three hundred years to complete. Our GDP has been ranked second in the world for many years. Perhaps in the near future, our GDP will surpass the United States and become the first in the world.
superpower.
All of this is inseparable from our country's excellent college entrance examination system. It is the excellent college entrance examination system that has imported a large number of high-quality talents into our country's economic construction.
To say whether an education system is a quality education does not depend on its college entrance examination form, but on the economic development of the entire country. After all, talent is the key factor that determines social development. The college entrance examination system is a continuous
An educational system that imports outstanding talents into the economic lifeline of a country.
Our country's college entrance examination system is obviously a true quality education. Our college entrance examination system has imported a large number of high-quality talents for the country's economic construction. These talents have made significant contributions to our country's economic construction.
In the past, we always said that we only have everything that is available abroad. But now we can say that it is only available abroad that we have. China now has many things, and they are already ahead of the world.
Especially in terms of Internet technology, it can be said to have surpassed other countries in the world. No country in the world's Internet technology can be compared with China's. Although the General Office of the Communist Party of China is not the country that invented the Internet, China has managed to catch up from behind.
.More than the United States, the country that invented the Internet. Many of our Internet technologies put Americans to shame.
This is especially true for Huawei's 5G technology, which has been making a lot of noise in recent days. This shows that China has surpassed the United States in terms of talent and technology. Our country has the largest number of the best talents in the world.
The primary contributor to this situation is of course China’s college entrance examination system. It can be said that without China’s college entrance examination system, China would not have the good economic development situation it has today. From the perspective of China’s economic development, only China’s education system is
Real quality education. The American education system is not quality education at all, it is just a bourgeois private ownership education for the rich.
Although their education system can also import some outstanding talents to the country, it is obvious that this method of importing talents is insufficient because it does not maximize the input of talents. It only screens some talents within a certain range.
When it comes to the country's economic construction, talents in another range have obviously not been screened out.
Only China's education system is the most reasonable and complete education system. It can screen talents to the greatest extent and allow the most talents to flow into the country's economic construction army. This not only contributes to the country's economic construction.
It can also allow many poor children to change their own destiny and the situation of their families through the college entrance examination. This is an education system that offers the best of both worlds, and it is an education system worth boasting about.
Although our education system is good, we cannot train every child in our family to be an excellent college student. The education system can continue to change, reform, and improve.
But the question of how to educate an ordinary student into an excellent student is an eternal problem.
How do students study well? How do students study poorly? What is the difference between students who study well and students who study poorly? This is also a puzzling and interesting question.
We always say that children who study well are smart children, while children who study poorly are stupid children.
But is this really the case? Could it be that those children who study well all look very smart? And those children who study poorly all look like silly students!
Obviously this is not the case. Not only is it not the case, it can even be said to be the opposite. Have we ever discovered that the top few students in any class are not as smart as the bottom few students?
Those students who study well are generally introverted students who are not very good at communicating. They are not at all like some students who study poorly, who are very good at talking and appear to be very lively.
Relatively speaking, those students who study well do not look smart, while those students who study poorly do not look smart. Because they are generally eloquent and eloquent.
and some athletic ability.
This shows that it is obviously unreasonable to use smart and stupid to describe students who study well and students who study poorly. Studying well does not mean being smart, and studying poorly does not mean stupid. What is the difference and what is the reason.
It can be said to be an eternal puzzle, and it is difficult to find a fixed answer.
Being good at studying is not because you are smart, and being poor at studying is not because you are stupid. What is the difference between the two? This is a topic worthy of discussion by all of us and experts and scholars.
Yu believes that good study is not because of intelligence, but because of interest. Poor study is not because of stupidity, but because of lack of interest.
Learning is a standard type of mental work. The biggest difference between mental work and physical work is that mental work is a kind of interest work. It is something that is done because of a certain interest.
This is not the case with physical labor. It has little to do with interest. Even if you are not interested, you can still engage in some kind of physical labor. You can also do this kind of labor well. Because physical labor is just a simple labor, it is a kind of physical labor.
Physical consumption and replenishment is a form of labor that can be completed with some effort.
Learning is not like this. It is a standard mental work supported by interest. Only children who are interested in learning can learn well. Children who are not interested in learning will find it difficult to learn well.
good.
When it comes to learning, we often talk about a word. This word is full of philosophy and metaphysics. This word is called "gifted".
Many people think that children study well or achieve success in other areas because they have this kind of thing in them. They think this kind of thing is the key to a person's success.
Here, I don’t want to say how much scientific content this word has. I just want to say a famous saying by the inventor King Edison. Genius is one percent talent and ninety-nine percent perspiration.
From this sentence, we can see that even geniuses have to work hard to succeed. Although they have one percent talent, they still have to work hard.
How was the light bulb invented? It was Edison and his partners at Monroe who worked tirelessly on more than 1,600 experiments with heat-resistant materials and more than 600 kinds of plant fibers before creating the first carbon filament light bulb, which could burn in one go.
45 hours. Later, he continued to improve the manufacturing method on this basis, and finally launched a bamboo filament light bulb that can burn for 1,200 hours.
It was Edison who brought mankind from darkness to light and opened the most glorious page in human history.
Edison was a genius. But it was such a genius that he invented the first electric light in human history, but he failed countless times before succeeding. What does this mean? It means that the talent of a genius is not very important. What is important is interest.
Yu believes that the so-called talent is a kind of interest. It is not an elusive, metaphysical or idealistic thing at all. This is because we cannot explain how those accomplished people are successful. So, we start to make random guesses.
What's the difference between people and ordinary people? I just thought that they must have something that ordinary people don't have. So, the word "gifted" came into being.
Obviously, the word itself is quite idealistic. It is believed that some people are ‘gods’ and know everything. They are born different and are existences that are beyond ordinary people.
Of course, there are obviously many things we still don’t understand about the human brain, the most magical substance in the universe. It can be said that we know more about the universe than we know about the brain.
More. Our brains can penetrate the entire universe, but they cannot penetrate themselves.
Yu believes that students who study well are not ‘gifted’. It’s just that they have been interested in learning since childhood. This allows them to work hard to maintain a good state of study.
Students with poor academic performance can only mean that they have never been interested in learning. They do not want to learn at all. Learning is a burden and burden for them, and it is something they are unwilling to do.
Since you are not willing to do it, how can you do it well? The great Einstein said that interest is the best teacher. And he himself is the best proof. Now we all say that Einstein is
Genius. But when he was young, he did not show any "gift".