Isn't it a good thing to make the lives of the people of Hong Kong Island better and better? Of course it is a good thing, but there must be a prerequisite, that is, it must be within your ability. It is naturally good if you have the ability to provide benefits to the people, just like one person for a month
If you earn a thousand yuan, you will normally spend two to three hundred yuan a month for food, and the remaining money may be used to buy some clothes or other needs, and you may be able to save more than a hundred yuan in the end. This is normal.
But if you spend five to six hundred yuan for meals and the remaining money to buy things, not only will you not be able to save any money in the end, but you will also have to use your savings to make up for it. What will you do if your savings are used up? Then you can only start over.
I have been living a life of two to three hundred yuan a month for food.
This is the kind of life that Hong Kong Island lived under the governance of the last governor of Hong Kong, which provided great benefits to the people. This kind of benefits far exceeded their financial capabilities and almost emptied the family fortunes of Hong Kong Island. How high are the benefits?
At the time of the handover in the previous life, the welfare of the people of Hong Kong Island was already very close to that of the United Kingdom, but in reality
There is a huge income gap between the two sides. At that time, the annual per capita income in Hong Kong was more than 15,000 US dollars, and in the UK it was more than 40,000 US dollars. The difference between the two sides was more than double, the income difference was three times, but the social welfare benefits were similar.
, everyone can see the intended purpose, which is to leave a deficit to the country.
Losing family wealth is not fatal. At worst, the country will pay for it, but what about the people? Will you give them so many benefits? Obviously not, because this is no longer in line with the laws of a normal country. Any country in the world
It is impossible to do this, but if you don't give it, you will fall into the trap of the British. Look, we British will be finished as soon as we leave Hong Kong Island. It is all your responsibility, China, and has nothing to do with me.
Go to hell! It has nothing to do with you? It’s your fault. Even idiots can see it. But there are a bunch of people in Hong Kong who can’t see it. They think the British are good, the British are wonderful, and the British are awesome.
This has caused a lot of "grievances" among the people, and thus laid hidden dangers.
It has to be said that the British are very clever in their intrigues, and have even reached the pinnacle. Especially when it comes to big issues like sovereignty, no one in the world can match them. The border issue between China and India is their fault.
The border issues between India and Pakistan were caused by them, as were the conflicts between South Korea and North Korea. The Americans, the "sons" of the British, inherited my skills and also created a lot of troubles around the world. Every one of them was caused by them.
Everywhere I passed was a scene of chaos.
Their method of "good welfare" is indeed very clever. At least in the previous life, many people were not aware of the harm involved. Even if the top leaders of the country discovered the tricks and protested many times, it was useless. People said that we have already formulated the policy.
It cannot be changed, and in the end the country has no choice but to swallow the consequences. But at that time, not many people really realized how serious the consequences were, and it would be a disaster for many years.
In fact, the problem on Hong Kong Island is not only the welfare system, but also the British in all aspects. For example, when the British left, they secretly issued "passwords" to more than 50,000 people in Hong Kong. They are all members of society.
As long as the elites take out this password, they will immediately obtain British identity and can bring their property to live in the UK. This trick is to hollow out the elites of Hong Kong Island so that there will be no talent available here.
This is not the most powerful thing, there is even more powerful thing, that is, the British left a group of teachers with strong "dog-licking" ideas in the school, asking them to teach those children, "brainwash" the children, and let them
They strongly disagree with China's identity and think that Britain is good and the British are a civilized country, but China is not good and is a "despicable" nation.
There is also a large number of "dog-licking" elements in the Legislative Council of Hong Kong Island. These people still hold high positions even after the return of Hong Kong Island. After all, Hong Kong Island politics adopts European and American laws and requires separation of powers.
, which gives them a good opportunity to "show off their talents".
The chief executive of Hong Kong Island must be a Hong Kong Islander, but the same cannot be said for the legislative body. Only three or four of the more than 20 justices have Hong Kong Island identity, and the others are all British.
What would happen if a group of British people were asked to legislate China's land? Can American justices be Chinese? I've never heard of it.
This is a contradictory thing. The return of Hong Kong Island has become China's territory. Although there are two systems, the premise is one country, that is, China. Since it is China's territory, why should a group of foreigners serve in power agencies? It's simply
That’s nonsense!
This is the conspiracy of the British. They left such a group on Hong Kong Island in order to control the law in the future.
More than 20 years later, some people on Hong Kong Island took to the streets to demonstrate under various banners, euphemistically claiming it was for Hong Kong Island.
Well, the laws of Hong Kong Island allow ordinary people to do this, but the prerequisite is that you cannot cause sabotage, but the nature of the British and American participation has changed. They are fanning the flames behind the scenes. Not only are they fanning the flames, they also send some secret "dog-licking" elements from the CIA.
Provide them with professional training, provide them with equipment, and pay them wages after completing relevant work.
With the participation of Britain and the United States, it is no longer an ordinary parade. It has become an organized and planned sabotage activity. Needless to say, smashing, smashing, and looting, they dare to fight with the Hong Kong Island police. Yes, they dare to fight face to face with the law enforcement forces.
.
You cause damage and the police come to take care of you, but a bunch of guys beat the police up and call it for the good of Hong Kong Island. What's the good thing?
The "just and awe-inspiring" people who engage in destruction are like lost dogs. The whole situation is reversed. Why? Because the British and Americans support it!
The support of Britain and the United States is an important reason, but Hong Kong Island is China's territory. No matter how arrogant they are, they dare not openly lead a group of "licking dogs" to cause trouble on the streets. This is too low-level. They have higher-level "cards" in their hands.
", that is a group of guys who stand on the commanding heights of the law, that is, the group of people in the legislative body.
This group of people holds the power to interpret the law. The people who caused damage were caught by the police. They said it was fine and they could just do community welfare. When the police enforced the law and arrested this group of troublemakers, they glared: You know the law and break it.
Stay in jail for half a year!
Is this a law to maintain order? It is simply to protect those lawbreakers and let them beat the police without restraint. Who would dare to enforce the law if we encounter this situation again over time?
In the movie, the Hong Kong police are brave and fearless, and they refuse to retreat in the face of vicious gangsters, but they immediately give in when they encounter these guys, and they dare not enforce the law normally even if they know that the other party has violated the law.
When all law enforcement agencies dare not enforce the law, then the society will be in great danger. And when a legislative body favors those who make trouble, then the society will be in danger. This is the case in Hong Kong Island more than ten years later.