(The previous chapter was deleted again. It was about the reasons for everything happening in Hong Kong Island. I really can’t figure out why someone reported it. Could it be that scolding the British affected some people?)
During the era of British management, the Legislative Council of Hong Kong Island was never elected by the people. Since it was always appointed by the Governor of Hong Kong, it was called the "Council" or the Legislative Council, which means that it is part of the administrative structure.
But in 1995, the British Hong Kong government created an elected "Legislative Council" for the first time. Its purpose was to create what the British said in English was a "revolution with high expectations and unsatisfied expectations" before leaving.
A revolution that no British could satisfy.
In 2016, an oath-taking farce broke out in the Legislative Council of Hong Kong Island. Some newly elected members attempted to alter the oath of office, while others took the opportunity to make separatist claims. All this proved that the British
Deliberately creating a "revolution with high expectations and unfulfilled expectations" on Hong Kong Island has indeed worked.
In another example, two important laws and regulations that were crucial to maintaining security on Hong Kong Island during the British Hong Kong era were rashly canceled by the British before leaving.
One is the "Public Security Ordinance" and the other is the "Society Ordinance". During the period when the Public Security Ordinance has not been abolished, if a group of people wants to take to the streets to demonstrate, they must first apply and obtain a license from the Hong Kong Island Police. If the police do not approve, the procession will
It is illegal, and the police can arrest people immediately. After the cancellation of the Public Order Regulations on Hong Kong Island, demonstrators only need to notify the police while marching on the streets.
Therefore, this is why after the handover of Hong Kong Island in 1997, demonstrations took place at every turn.
Under the previous Societies Ordinance, the Governor of Hong Kong could immediately declare any Hong Kong society to be an illegal organization and revoke its license if he suspected that it had connections with foreign countries, including accepting donations from foreign countries.
Looking back today, the British abolished these two laws with extremely evil intentions.
Another important institution during the British Hong Kong period was the High Court and the Court of Final Appeal. They followed the British tradition and belonged to the case law system. The judges' judgments played a decisive role in the judicial process. This was completely different from the civil law system practiced in the mainland. The judges'
Appointment and dismissal also follows the British life system. Once appointed by the Hong Kong Governor, a judge can serve for life unless he dies or retires voluntarily.
During the British Hong Kong period, the vast majority of judges appointed were British nationals, and this problem remains to this day.
Among the appointments of permanent and non-permanent justices to the new Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal that was formed in 2016, only two of the seventeen justices were Hong Kong citizens, and the rest were foreign nationals or dual nationals.
Their jurisprudence has a strong tendency. The judiciary's light sentencing of thugs and indifference to the rights of police officers have also contributed to the atrocities.
Before the British retreat, they cultivated a group of civil servants who believed in Western values, especially senior civil servants who were pro-British.
The four-man gang that disrupted Hong Kong and so on are all spokespersons of the UK. For example, Chen Ansheng is a typical example. The other three are Li Zhiying, Li Quanming, and Chen Yujun. They either once held high positions or were famous people.
, have great influence on Hong Kong Island. Their "precepts and deeds" have, to a certain extent, encouraged some people in Hong Kong Island to recognize Western values from the bottom of their hearts and not recognize the two systems system implemented by China.
Chen Ansheng was promoted by Boten. In 1993, Boten asked her to succeed Huo De and become the first Chinese Chief Secretary (renamed Chief Secretary for Administration after the return of China).
After Hong Kong Island returned to China, the British were still thinking about this land. The British government ignored the fact that Hong Kong Island was returned to China and frequently made comments on Hong Kong Island affairs and provoked the government.
Even the British Foreign Secretary repeatedly issued statements that completely distorted the agreement between China and the United Kingdom. They tried to claim that the United Kingdom retained some rights on Hong Kong Island.
The spokesperson of the British Foreign Office always declares: We are a co-signatory of the joint statement, and by monitoring its implementation, we are acting responsibly in accordance with our commitments, rather than interfering...
The "monitoring" among the British people has also been "implemented" in writing. From the first month after the handover, the British government began to publish the first "Semi-Annual Report on Hong Kong Island Issues".
So these things are essentially those Westerners who do not want Hong Kong Island to truly return to the embrace of the country.
Liu Lang felt that it was necessary to remind the country that since it is already one country, two systems, well, not only the government should be managed by Hong Kong people, but also the judicial system should be implemented by Hong Kong people. It is reasonable! Why don't you get a bunch of British people to administer the judiciary on Hong Kong Island?
How is it appropriate for the system to tell you 50% or 60%? Of course, you British people can also hold important positions, but the prerequisite is that you have to give up your British nationality and must be a native of Hong Kong Island. Otherwise, just have fun and don't push me every day.
Liu Lang wrote an article with more than 10,000 words. The article elaborated on the various problems faced by Hong Kong Island before its return, such as finance, law, education, etc., especially the importance of the judicial system to the future of Hong Kong Island.
Therefore, the country must not take this aspect lightly and must fight for its reasons. Even if it achieves some substantial results now, it must set rules and gradually change them after the return. It cannot be at the mercy of Westerners like in previous lives.
This article starts with Western law. Why should we talk about Western law? That is, Hong Kong Island will still use Western law after its return. Of course, this does not mean that Western law is not good. After all, justice is the foundation of Chinese and Western law. As long as it is fair, there will be no
Wrong, Western laws are fair in the West, but this is not the case in Hong Kong Island. Hong Kong Island, where the judicial system is occupied by Westerners, will not be treated fairly. Therefore, the country must argue with the British government within the judicial system.
Don't compromise, otherwise there will be endless consequences.
Liu Lang handed the article to Shao Mingtao, and on the third day he was taken to Bai Weiren's office again.
Bai Weiren had just returned from the south. After seeing this article, he immediately summoned the chief officials of the country's judicial department and distributed the article for everyone to read, which attracted everyone's attention.
To be honest, in the early 1990s, the country didn’t know much about Western laws and felt that it had nothing to do with itself. However, Liu Lang’s article drew everyone’s attention to a hidden danger. Will Hong Kong Island become a
An unfair society.
"I think this is possible. Westerners, especially the United Kingdom and the United States, have always been biased against us and have bad intentions. Liu Lang's proposal is so timely. We must take it seriously!"
The head of the national judicial institution was the first to speak and fully agreed with Liu Lang's proposal.
"That's right, we didn't pay attention to these details before. Now Liu Lang's article lets everyone know the secrets. If the kind of thing Liu Lang mentioned really happens, we really have nothing to do at that time. We can only