The first thousand one hundred and twenty-seven chapters steal the concept
"Wow, it's fake again!"
"Haha, I guessed it a long time ago, don't say I was an afterthought.
If nothing else, just focus on the clause that during the signing period, all copyrights of self-composed songs belong to the company, do you think any artist in their right mind can sign this?"
"That's right, this clause is simply disgusting. With Fang Wenfei's reputation, it's strange that she signed it."
"Mingyu Company looks so ugly and treats us like fools."
"There must be something wrong with Lin Peng, too. The appraisals in both lawsuits were wrong. It's really unjustifiable. How did he become the vice president of the Cultural Relics Association?"
"I don't think there is anything wrong with Lin Peng's professional ability, but in private with Mingyu Company...hehe, that's hard to say."
"There's no need to be so secretive. There have been rumors for a long time that Gao Pingfeng, the plaintiff in the previous lawsuit, was secretly instigated by Mingyu Company?
These two cases may seem unrelated, but in fact the plaintiff and defendant are all the same people!”
Everyone in the Law Court heard this and immediately started talking.
On the live broadcast stage, barrages such as "Mingyu Company forged contract signatures", "Conspiracy exposed", etc. were posted all over the sky.
Lu Youwei, Yang Lu and others were extremely frightened and angry.
The signature on the contract is not Fang Wenfei’s?
How is this possible! They clearly printed the contract on a blank A4 paper signed by Fang Wenfei.
Although the contract is fake, the signature cannot be real anymore! "Fang, you lied!"
Lu Youwei couldn't help but stood up and shouted angrily: "You must have accepted Fang Wenfei's bribe to do the fake appraisal!"
Everyone was surprised.
Fang Hua's expression also changed.
"quiet!"
The lawyer's face was livid, he picked up his gavel, banged it hard, and said sternly: "Plaintiff, you spoke without permission, and you are in contempt of the court. You falsely accused the appraiser in public, which is a serious violation of court discipline. Apologize immediately, otherwise I will immediately
Revoke your qualification as a plaintiff and ask the legal police to take you out!"
Fang Hua was an expert teacher that even they admired very much. How could he tolerate a boss with a sinister face and a gangster appearance talking nonsense and slandering him.
Qin Hanlin grabbed Lu Youwei and said urgently: "Mr. Lu, don't get excited and don't confront Lu Ting."
Confronting the legal court is not just about losing the lawsuit.
Lu Youwei calmed down after being given a slap in the face, suppressed the anger in his heart, and said in a low voice: "I'm sorry, presiding judge, I got emotional. I sincerely apologize to the law court and promise that I will never do it again in the future."
After saying that, he bowed to Fang Hua again: "I'm sorry, Teacher Fang, I offended you in my impatience, and I apologize to you."
He added: "But Teacher Fang, I swear on my life that Wen Fei's signature on the contract is absolutely genuine. Can you take a closer look?"
Fang Hua said calmly: "The court only talks about evidence, and swearing is useless. You said that Wen Fei's signature on the contract is genuine. What evidence is there to prove it?"
Lu Youwei was speechless and didn't know what to say.
He couldn't say that he had someone trick Fang Wenfei into signing the contract on a blank A4 paper and then printing it, right?
After hesitating for a moment, Lu Youwei said: "I saw her sign the contract with my own eyes. There were many colleagues in the company at the time, and everyone saw it."
Everyone shook their heads in unison.
Such arguments are unconvincing.
Fang Hua ignored Lu Youwei and turned to the lawyer: "Presiding judge, I've finished the appraisal."
The lawyer said: "Thank you, Teacher Fang, for your appraisal."
After saying that, he comforted him: "Teacher Fang, please don't pay attention to what happened just now..." Fang Hua smiled and said, "It doesn't matter, I've seen this kind of thing too many times."
He walked off the platform, waved to the lawyer, the others and Ren Chaoyu, and then left the court.
The lawyer said: "Plaintiff, the results of the re-authentication of the contract signatures have been released, overturning the original appraisal results of the first instance. Do you have any new evidence to submit?"
Lu Youwei gritted his teeth and whispered: "Lawyer Qin, I beg you, you must let the three handwriting appraisal experts invited by the Law School do another appraisal."
In his opinion, Fang Wenfei's signature was 10,000% authentic, and the problem must lie with Fang Hua.
However, the Law Courts defended Fang Hua, and he could only place his hopes on other handwriting identification experts.
Qin Hanlin looked embarrassed: "Mr. Lu, I can try my best, but it's difficult for the Law School to do this."
Fang Hua is a top expert in handwriting appraisal. He has already done the appraisal. Why is there any need for someone with lower qualifications and level than Fang Hua to do it again?
This is like the boss of a company has promised to give employees a salary increase, so does the deputy general manager need to promise it again before it counts?
It is impossible for the Court of Justice to support such a request that puts the cart before the horse.
Seeing the two people muttering without answering, the lawyer couldn't help but frowned: "Plaintiff, what am I asking you?
If you don’t answer, I will treat it as if you have no new evidence to submit.”
Lu Youwei quickly pushed Qin Hanlin: "Lawyer Qin, I believe you."
Qin Hanlin sighed, stood up and said: "President, we have no new evidence, but we request the three handwriting appraisal experts invited by the Law Court to conduct another appraisal of the contract signature."
The lawyer's face turned cold: "Why?"
Qin Hanlin gritted his teeth and said: "Presiding judge, we are not questioning Teacher Fang Hua's qualifications and professional abilities, but as you said before, using the method of multi-person appraisal and final appraisal opinion can minimize the risk of
An authentication error occurred."
"Do another appraisal. If the appraisal results of the three handwriting appraisal experts invited by the Law School are the same as those of Teacher Fang Hua, then even if we lose the case, we will be convinced and have nothing to say. But if the appraisal results are different, wouldn't it mean that I have been wronged?
party?"
"And doing so will not be a disadvantage for the plaintiff. Since the plaintiff firmly believes that the signature on the contract is fake, doing another appraisal will only go through one more process, and it will also make the appraisal results more convincing."
"Since the second instance is the final instance, there is no appeal after the judgment, and the appraisal result in this case determines the judgment. Therefore, for the sake of careful consideration, I have just made the above request and ask the court for approval."
Lu Youwei's eyes lit up and he couldn't help but give a thumbs up and praised in a low voice: "Lawyer Qin, you said it well!"
Everyone also nodded slightly.
Initially, they all felt that the plaintiff's request for another appraisal was quite excessive, but after hearing Qin Hanlin's remarks, they felt that it made sense.
The lawyer sneered and said: "You really know how to say that it seems that doing another appraisal is not only for your own good, but also for the good of the plaintiff, and also for the sake of the court's judgment. It looks good to all three parties and everyone is happy. In fact, you are deliberately stealing
Change the concept, moral kidnapping!"
"Since the appraisal has been completed by top experts, why do we need to do it again?"
"This is like a customer going to the bank to withdraw money. After counting the money, the bank teller said that in order to avoid making mistakes, he asked to count it again. The reason is that since the result of counting the money is correct, what does it matter if he counts it again?
What’s more, it can also help customers’ money counting results be more convincing.
If you were a customer, do you still think this reason is reasonable?”